By submitting a paper to ICIVC, the
authors agree to the review process and
understand that papers undergo a
peer-review process. Manuscripts will be
reviewed by appropriately qualified
experts in the field selected by the
Conference Committee, who will give
detailed comments and if the
submission gets accepted the authors
submit a revised ("camera-ready")
version that takes into account this
feedback.
All papers are reviewed
using a single-blind review process:
authors declare their names and
affiliations in the manuscript for the
reviewers to see, but reviewers do not
know each other's identities, nor do the
authors receive information about who
has reviewed their manuscript.
The
Committees of ICIVC 2025 invest great
efforts in reviewing the papers
submitted to the conference and
organising the sessions to enable the
participants to gain maximum benefit.
By submitting a manuscript to ICIVC, authors acknowledge that it has not been previously published or accepted for publication in substantially similar form in any peer-reviewed venue with publicly accessible papers, including journals, conferences, workshops, or other peer-reviewed, archival forums. Furthermore, no paper substantially similar in content has been or will be submitted to another peer-reviewed conference or workshop with publicly accessible papers during the review period. The authors also attest that they did not submit a substantially similar submission to ICIVC 2025. As a rule of thumb, the ICIVC submission should contain no more than 20 percent of material from previous publications. Violation of any of these conditions will lead to rejection.
Objectively deploy reliable communities vis-a-vis holistic web-readiness.Intrinsicly strategize exceptional mindshare vis-a-vis functionalized imperatives.Energistically incentivize innovative convergence through wireless ideas.